° ♡＊ Maggie M. C. Wu ＊♡ °

今天去找Rollins拿上學期
From Modern to Postmodern 的期末考考卷,
我只能說~
能從Rollins手上拿到這成績,
晚上不吃,
我都飽了!!
因為他的功課"多的有名",
分數也給的"低的有名"




Rollins給了我3句評語:
1. Very good on general level
    (這句話也太感人~~ 辛苦一學期這句話抵過千言萬語阿...)
2. Good use of secondary works.
3. Good choices of examples, but explainations incomplete, esp. Kurt Vonnegut.

媽~我要把這張考卷拿去裱框!!!!!



大略說一下我們的考題:
Write an essay of at least four paragraphs in which you explain your understanding of 
literary postmodernism including how it is both a continuation of and a revolt against literary
modernism. Then discuss three writers we have studied this semester that you feel best
examplify what you understand to be postmodernism. Carefully explain, with specific examples,
why you chosen each writer. Be sure to use some of the theoretical essays we have discussed
in class to help you support your arguments and make comparisons among these writers 
where you feel it is appropriate.


其中第二部份,
我舉的3個作家作品為:
1. Grace Paley's A Conversation with My Father
2. Raymond Carver's Cathedral
3. Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five



針對第3題Rollins說我沒寫完,
我只能說...
我的缺點真是無所遁形 =  =+
因為寫到最後我整個來不及阿阿阿阿~
雖然考試時間有3小時,
我還是寫不完....
@@



To sum up,
Rollins的一句 "Very good on general level"
勝過阿龔跟我說20句阿~~